Jules Verne Forum

<jvf@Gilead.org.il>

[Email][Members][Photos][Archive][Search][FAQ][Passwd][private]

Re: Jules Verne at home

From: Jean-Michel Margot <jmmargot~at~mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:56:09 -0400
To: Jules Verne Forum <jvf~at~Gilead.org.il>


At 09:30 24.08.2004, you wrote:
>I'm just re-reading the html version of "Jules Verne at home" (1895) by
>Marie A. Belloc where we can read:
>
>"As he sat talking he didn't look his seventy eight years, and, indeed,
>appeared but little changed since the large portrait, hanging opposite
>that of his wife, was painted some twenty odd years ago."
>The picture itself says "Age 45".
>
>Is the "age 78" an original mistake? Sorry if the question had already
>been raised before...

The Strand Magazine text is as you quoted it above, Ralf. It's printed
"seventy-eight". The article is illustrated with two Verne portraits: one
at age 45 and one "Present day".


Jean-Michel Margot
226 Thomas Ruffin Str
Hillsborough, NC 27278
USA
Tel (919) 644-7327
email jmmargot~at~mindspring.com
webpage http://www.ajmm.net
Received on Wed 25 Aug 2004 - 22:59:19 IDT

hypermail 2.2.0 JV.Gilead.org.il
Copyright © Zvi Har’El
$Date: 2009/02/01 22:36:11 $$