Figure 1. Maps drafted by Verne for 20,000 Leagues (1870)
La Carte mise en circulation1
“So, you’ve crossed this country?”
“Of course!” Paganel replied severely.
“No, in an armchair.”
The Children of Captain Grant I §11 (1867)
We can dispense with the tiresome canard that Jules Verne never traveled far from his homes in Nantes, Paris, Crotoy, and Amiens. His first trips abroad were in 1859, by steamship to England and Scotland with Aristide Hignard, a close friend and Verne’s collaborator on several early theatrical works; and he traveled again with Hignard in 1861 to Denmark and Norway.2 In 1867, he took his only trip to the United States with his brother Paul—they visited New York and Niagara Falls—aboard Brunel’s grand liner the Great Eastern.3 Between 1868 and 1884, Verne made several short voyages on the Seine and along the coasts of France on the Saint Michel I and its successor, the Saint Michel II, modest sailing yachts purchased in 1868 and 1876, respectively. He
In 1886, Verne ended these peregrinations. The expenses of maintaining the Saint Michel III proved onerous (it was considerably more luxurious than its predecessors, with a full-time crew of ten); he was forced to sell the yacht at a loss.5 Family troubles, the death of his longtime friend and mentor Pierre-Jules Hetzel, failing health (including cataracts in both eyes, diabetes, and sequelae of a bizarre assault by a nephew that left Verne lame), and growing financial difficulties had begun to take their toll. After the late 1880s, he seldom left Amiens. In a November 1894 letter to Alexandre Dumas fils, Verne complained of the infirmities of old age: “If I have maintained a taste for work…, nothing remains of my youth. I live in the heart of my province and never budge from it, even to go to Paris. I travel only by maps.”6
Analysis of the significance and functions of maps in Verne’s writing and published works must begin, then, with an acknowledgment of the practical aspects of his uses of maps and the terrains, real and imagined, they depict. Verne, unlike the fictional Paganel, was not an armchair traveler. His nonfiction works demonstrate a thorough understanding of the methods of modern cartography; several of his novels (most notably, The Adventures of Three Russians and Three Englishmen ) embrace technical problems of cartography and geodesy. These facts should not be taken, however, to suggest a firm distinction within his fiction between pragmatic applications of mapmaking (documentation, navigation, mimesis) and its literary functions (verisimilitude, projection of an imaginary, narration). In Verne, maps are always ambiguous and semiotically unstable objects.
Thirty of the novels in the 47-volume octavo editions of the Voyages Extraordinaires published by Pierre-Jules Hetzel (from 1863 until his death in 1887) and his son Jules Hetzel (until 1919) include one or more engraved maps; there are forty-two such engravings in all.7 The six volumes of Verne’s published nonfiction on history and geography include dozens more political, topographic, and oceanographic maps and charts.8 The covers and frontispieces of the celebrated cartonnages colorés et dorés (colored and gold inlaid bindings), while not maps strictly speaking, are (as I will argue later in this essay) elements of a subtle but unmistakable cartographic idiom enframing the works’ reception by contemporary readers.9
These images and design elements are nuanced, graceful, and evocative; drafted and engraved by some of the finest artists of the time, they represent the pinnacle of late nineteenth-century popular-scientific cartography. In describing their engagements with textual methods and procedures of Verne’s fiction as his cartographies, I mean to emphasize their complex relations to his texts in support of the spatial imaginaries of his heroes’ adventures. This program is clearly discernible in the corroborative and sometimes juxtaposed significance of maps and elements resembling maps (the illustrations of the Hetzel editions), of textual passages that read like maps (Verne’s taxonomic
Des Cartes maîtresses.10 Several of the maps appearing in the Hetzel Voyages were drafted under Verne’s close supervision or were based on his sketches or designs. Maps in three of the novels (20,000 Leagues [Figure 1], Hatteras [Figure 2], Three Russians) were drafted by Verne himself, whose talents in this regard were appreciable. In each of these works, the attribution to Verne of an image that doubles and seems to corroborate the novels’ textual orders—terrains shown in these maps recognizably belong to the “real” world—complicates and extends effects of the novels’ formal structures. These maps are the only graphic devices of the texts attributed to Verne; other images, maps, and design elements in the Voyages are unattributed or credited to one or more artists listed on the frontispieces below the name of the author, thereby marking their accessory role in the presentation of the work (“Illustrated with 111 drawings by De Neuville,” “Illustrated with 53 vignettes by Férat,” etc.).11 Verne’s designation as the creator of the text (in the strict sense) and of its maps (assuming, provisionally, that this distinction is meaningful) subtly trangresses a common convention of illustrated fiction of the mid- and late-nineteenth century, in which the author of the text is plainly differentiated from the illustrators, the typesetters, the designers of the binding, etc. (The author’s text is thus held apart from its multiple, possibly varying, mass-produced forms; illustrations support or sustain the textual register of the work, adding value to a specific presentation of it; the essence of the textual work is its semantic content; its plastic or paratextual formal elements are the province of its publishers and distributors, etc. Hetzel’s frequent excerpting from and re-publication of Verne’s fiction and nonfiction in different bindings and formats would be a textbook example of this practice.12) Because this distinction is confirmed in every other novel in the Voyages, Verne’s role as author of text and image in these exceptional cases also marks a potential crossing of textual and paratextual boundaries implicit in this convention.13
Verne is too conscious of the literary effects of this crossing not to apply them openly. A sly mixing of fictional and extrafictional orders is signalled in the legend of Verne’s map for Voyages and Adventures of Captain Hatteras (1866): “Cartes des régions circumpolaires, dressée pour le voyage du Capitaine J. Hatteras par Jules Verne, 1860-61” [“Map of the circumpolar regions, drafted for the voyage of Captain J. Hatteras by Jules Verne, 1860-61.”] (Figure 2).
Yet “1860–61” is the period of Hatteras’s ill-fated expedition to the North Pole; Verne did not begin work on the novel until 1863, and the map could not have been drafted much before the writing of the novel was underway (Martin,
Figure 2. “Carte des régions circumpolaires, dressée pour le voyage du Capitaine J. Hatteras par Jules Verne, 1860-61”
All the privileges of fiction’s recasting of the real obtain here: the simultaneous and unremarked presentation of actual and fictional names (belonging to actual and imagined places and persons) subverts that fragile distinction within the narrative domains that include them. This parallelism or levelling of the two orders also sustains the verisimilitude of the narrative—more significant with regard to Verne’s method, it inflects the actual with an influence of the unreal, so that signs of the former are treated no differently from signs of the latter.16 The “Davis Strait,” a body of water found on any modern map of the Arctic, is also a passage that Hatteras’s ship the Forward must cross en route to the Pole (Hatteras I§7). Beechy Island, site of a monument to the 129 dead of John Franklin’s ill-fated 1845 expedition, will also be visited by Hatteras’s crew, for whom the losses of the Erebus and the Terror and the terrible sufferings of their crews are a “somber warning of the destiny” awaiting them (Hatteras I§20). In the early 1860s, the Pole is still among the “mers ou terres inconnues” of the planisphere; nearly three decades
These interleavings of texts and graphics can also incorporate techniques of auto-citation. In the maps shown in Figure 1, the legend (“Vingt Mille Lieues sous les mers … par Jules Verne”) describes the path of the Nautilus, marked in a dotted line across the two maps.19 At the same time, the legend repeats the uppermost lines of the title page (“Jules Verne / Vingt Mille Lieues sous les mers”), joining the maps, the narrative of exploration, and the textual artifact that includes them (a book the reader holds in her hands, titled Vingt Mille Lieues…). This map is not only a snapshot of the submarine’s itinerary (shown all at once, not as it unfolds—I will return to this point). It is also a graphic double of the book that, paradoxically, includes it. The scientific romance is sustained by set-theoretical antinomies such as this.
But which book? The novel by “Jules Verne” (who appears also to have drawn this map), or the putatively nonfiction memoir of the same title by Pierre Aronnax that Verne’s text reproduces? If we accept for the moment the conceit that the novel is really Aronnax’s memoir—though this is never anything more than a conceit; the title page all but denies the possibility—then, who would be this “Jules Verne” who drew Aronnax’s maps? Is he the same person who drew the map of Hatteras’s transit of the pole? Within the world of the Voyages, the question is more than academic. One of the most important intertextual relays of the novels depends upon the Aronnax’s presumptive authorship of the memoir in his name: Cyrus Smith recognizes Nemo as the mysterious benefactor of the castaways of Lincoln Island because he has read Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, written by “the Frenchman thrown by chance aboard [Nemo’s] vessel, sixteen years ago” (Mysterious III§16).20 Smith is able to read Aronnax’s book, but he cannot have read Verne’s book; Verne anticipates paratextual and diegetic play typical of twentieth-century fiction (Auster, Ballard, Borges), but he never goes so far as to permit his characters to cross out of their world into his. The question, however, remains: has Smith seen “Jules Verne’s” map of Aronnax’s journey on the Nautilus? A careful reading of the Voyages only suggests this question, which will seem absurd only if we refuse Verne’s implied gambit that the answer may generate effects worthy of our attention. In his writing, practical questions of space are always subject to the laws of literary necessity.
Verne was, we know, a passionate and lifelong devoté of geography and cartography. As a young man growing up in Nantes in the 1830s, he was awarded school prizes in geography.21 In interviews with journalists in the 1890s, he expressed an admiration for celebrated geographers of his time (Elisée Reclus, Arago) equal to the novelists and dramatists who most
Figure 3. Left: Map of the route of the shipwrecked passengers of The Chancellor, drawn by Verne during the composition of the novel (c. 1870-74) (Source: Weissenberg, Un Univers fabuleux. Reproduced with permission of Éric Weissenberg.) Right: Celestial map drawn by Verne during the composition of Hector Servadac (c. 1876) (Source: Rionnet and Gondolo della Riva, Verne à Dinard. Reproduced with permission of Piero Gondolo della Riva.)
He often drew original charts and maps of his characters’ itineraries during the composition of these novels. Most of these documents are now lost, but the few that survive (Figure 3)—demonstrate the careful spatial plotting typical of the Voyages.24 Several of these draft documents are, in fact, the only comprehensive graphic depictions of the novels’ spaces, and their omission from published versions is often significant. The published texts of The Chancellor(1875), for example, include no maps of the route of the derelict ship and the raft constructed by its crew, though Verne relied on such a document (Figure 3). The survivors of the Chancellor are unaware of their position for most of the novel; the uncertainty of their course—also hidden from the reader, who has no map from which to plot their drift—contributes to their growing desperation, the novel’s building tension, and its surprising dénouement.25 Moreover, the presence of such an image in the published text would have undercut its most original stylistic trait: narrated entirely in the present tense—the first long work of European fiction to utilize this technique (Butcher, “Le Verbe et la chair”)—The Chancellor purports to be an account
Similarly, the lack of a map or similar graphic depiction of the course of the comet Gallia in published editions of Hector Servadac (1877) suggests a division between Verne’s compositional practices—in which such a map should have been useful (Figure 3)—and his methods for sustaining narrative suspense. The novel’s fantastic premise—Servadac and his comrades have been swept up on the surface of Gallia after its collision with North Africa—is long kept a mystery, though evidence that a massive geological event has taken place is abundant. (The reduced pull of gravity, the shortened day, the reversed course of the sun—Verne is never more irreverent with regard to the conventions of narrative verisimilitude than in this text; the reader may be amazed that the characters are so little alarmed by the transformation of their world.) Apparently realist devices such as a diagram of the route of the comet or a map of its surface would immediately collapse the extended parenthesis opened by the initial conditions of the adventure, and maintained to the point of farce only by an ironic and knowing reticence.26
Servadac is unique among Verne’s works in this tactical prolonging of uncertainty regarding the spaces of its adventure—a sign, perhaps, of its inverse lack of reserve with regard to the events that instigate the adventure.27 But the 1877 octavo edition of the novel is typical of the Voyages in certain aspects of the paratextual apparatus that set the conditions of its reading. As Éric Weissenberg has shown, the decor of Souze’s striking cartonnage du monde solaire (Figure 4) was based on a sketch by Verne of Gallia’s trajectory sent to Hetzel (“Le Cartonnage du monde solaire”).28 Hetzel’s letters to Verne during the composition of the novel show him to have been impatient and skeptical of its imaginative excesses. He forced on Verne numerous and substantial revisions, limiting the narrative’s fantastic elements and changing its original ending (Dumas, “Le Choc de Gallia”). The first published edition of the novel included an avertissement to the reader by Hetzel unique among the Voyages in its tenor and content, in which he reproaches the cometary voyage as an “extreme fantasy” and an “impossibility.”
But the image on the book’s first cover must also have operated as a counterpoint to Hetzel’s complaints to Verne and warning to the reader. The design of the cartonnage—half orrery half Ptolemaic celestial chart—signals in fact an entirely usual Vernian conflation of the actual and the imagined. In these baroque cycles and epicycles, a fantastic terrain is implicitly joined to a potentially rational space, measured or at least measurable. In this regard, it functions precisely as do the elements of the cover art of Hetzel’s editions of Verne’s nonfiction geographical writings, his less fantastic novels of exploration and discovery, and in the frontispieces of many of the novels (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Left: Hector Servadac (1877, cartonnage du monde solaire). Right: Frontispiece, The Fabulous Adventures of Captain Antifer (1894).
The thematic “fit” of these design elements may appear to have been dictated by their material—how better to designate a series of voyages dans les mondes connu et inconnus than by images of ocean- and airships, wheels, anchors, and planispheres? But in assuming that these elements are only accessory or recapitulative of the textual voyages they enframe, we may miss their inductive effects.29 They are the first signifiers the reader encounters when she surveys the (unopened) Vernian text: they mark her point of entry into worlds known and unknown. (Opening the book—turning the cover—is then a doubly opening gesture in this case: she enters the text, into an imaginary whose traits are signaled by iconic elements of the cover.) Verne’s adventures nearly always begin in medias res, the voyage already underway, signs of a mystery already witnessed, a letter in need of a reply, a found document in need of interpretation. The graceful, intriguing elements of the cartonnages participate in this formal break (another of Verne’s gambits): they suggest that the crossing of text and image, of narrative and cartography, has already begun at the boundary of the book and the reader’s world.
Figure 5. Above: “Le Noble Jeu des États-Unis d’Amérique.” Illustration by G. de Ribaucourt. Last Will I, vi (1899). Left: “The evening newspapers were snatched up two and three times the normal price....” Illustration by Georges Roux. Last Will, I, vi.
L’Invitation au voyage. This invocatory dimension of Verne’s cartography is plainly evident in one of the oddest “maps” of the Voyages, the playing board of his 1899 novel The Last Will of an Eccentric (Figure 5). Based on a sketch by Verne (now lost), the forty-eight United States, the District of Columbia, and the Indian territories occupy spaces of the game of “Le Noble Jeu des États-Unis d’Amérique,” a version of the classic children’s game known to English-speaking players as “Chutes and Ladders” or “Snakes and Ladders.”30 We can detect in this image an open invitation to read in parallel: that is, to trace the circuits of the seven competitors of the game according to sequences and detours of the board—which bears only this resemblance to the topography of the United States—while we read. George Roux’s depiction of partisans of the players scanning newspaper reproductions of the game board to determine
Spatial movement in Verne, no matter what its local surprises, is always as procedurally determinate and narratively capricious as a wild-goose chase. What could be more unnecessary than Phileas Fogg’s wager that he can circle the globe in only eighty days—a bet made during an extended game of whist, un jeu de cartes—or the decision of the outrageously obstinate Keraban to make the tour of the Black Sea by land so as to avoid the tariff for crossing at the Strait of Bosporus—and then to threaten to repeat the tour in the reverse direction on his arrival on the opposite shore (Keraban)?31 Such formal caprice can be the principle motive of the work; this may be Verne’s most strikingly modern trait.32 And it is—Verne is too good a reader of other authors to have mistaken this simplest and most efficient precondition for turning full circle, the privileged locus of the narrated adventure since at least Gilgamesh.33
Cycles and epicycles: Verne’s heroes wander widely and unevenly. Their most determined and careful itineraries are marked by crises of errancy, but always within a general figure of the circle. His many variations on the theme of the naufragés—shipwrecks, balloon wrecks, train wrecks, etc.; every machine of transport in Verne will eventually wreck, it seems—demonstrate his mastery of the narrative logic of the circular route. For, unlike its real counterpart, the literary wreck is always a calculated interruption within a wider circuit. When the hero returns to tell his tale—how else could it be told?—the trauma of the wreck then will be subsumed within another arc and submitted to the formal requirements of genre. Classic epic, the romance, and their modern offspring the robinsonnade do not always end happily, but they do come to an end, and in unambiguous demonstrations of the privileges of literary resolution over the hazards of the real.34 Verne’s contributions to these traditions are varied and inconsistent. The “scientific romance,” his invention, is a conflicted form, part romance, part positivist sermon (though its faith often wavers); it operates always in the tension of its stated aims of discovery, survey, and summary.35 This tension will be irreducible because discovery must always be potentially, and traumatically, at odds with the obsessional satisfactions of survey and summary.
Carto-graphy. A century later, we are familiar with the privileged scene of this conflict in the nineteenth-century psyche: the allure of a blank prompting the pleasures of closure and anxieties regarding the effects of closure. Joseph Conrad’s description of the scene is its best known version; one imagines that a childhood event like this may have spurred Verne to his writing:
It was in 1868, when nine years old or thereabouts, while looking at a map of Africa of the time and putting my finger on the blank space then representing the unsolved mystery of that continent, I said to myself, with absolute assurance and an amazing audacity which are no longer in my character now: “When I grow up, I shall go there.” (A Personal Record) 36
This is the happy, naive variant of the scene; in the twenty-first century, we can only read it with the expectation that the boy’s uncomprehending eagerness will end badly. As, of course, it does: Conrad incorporates the scene’s ghastly double in Marlowe’s account of his journey to and from the heart of darkness, where it will seem the cruelest of pretexts for authorial self-discovery.
Verne’s heroes are never as damaged by their circuits; the possibility of a safe return is held open even when it seems improbable or impossible (Chancellor, Hector Servadac, Journey, etc.). His indictments of colonialism, though frequent and bitter, are also less sharply drawn than Conrad’s and more partial in their assessments of the colonial powers (England is nearly always condemned without condition; France is given a pass). They are more resigned to an inevitable outcome of the collisions of cultures (Rogé, “Verne– Conrad”). But it is no coincidence that Verne was also fascinated by the spectral region Conrad described as “the blankest of blank spaces on the Earth’s figured surface,” as they have in common this fetishizing of its unmarked terrains. The trajectory of the explorers of Five Weeks in a Balloon (1863) neatly bisects the African continent through that void; the “Grand Forest” of his irreverent and pessimistic 1901 novel of human origins, The Aerial Village, is situated in its center.
Maps encode phenomenal space in panoptic forms—in an era of high-resolution satellite imaging and computer-enhanced photography, this function of maps will seem less compelling, less obvious to us than it would have to Verne or Conrad. The cartographic gaze tends toward the widest possible range over its domain, even as—I will return to this point—it is kept at one remove from its object. From this vantage, a synthetic spatial consciousness is literally, materially, representable: Chairman Island is revealed to resemble the silhouette of a butterfly (A Two Year’s Vacation), New Switzerland, the outline of a tumbling leaf (Second Homeland). Lincoln Island’s strange appendage, “Presqu’île Serpentine (Mysterious Island),” coils at the ready, anticipating the charged energies unleashed in the novel’s plutonian climax (Figure 6).37
The island revealed itself under the gaze like a relief map, with its various tints, greens for the forests, yellows for the sands, blues for the waters. They could see it in its entirety [Ils la saisissaient dans tout son ensemble]. The ground hidden beneath the immense canopy, the bottom of the shadowy valleys, the interior of the narrow gorges extending to the foot of the volcano—only these escaped their searching eyes. (Mysterious I§11)Verne produced three novels involving travel in outer space (Earth to Moon, Around the Moon, Hector Servadac), one involving deep-sea voyages (20,000 Leagues), two underground adventures (Journey, Black Indies), and more than fifty novels involving journeys over, or flying above land, sea, and ice.38 His vehicles are impressive but rarely unprecedented. His reputation for technical invention has been much exaggerated, and some of the most remarkable voyages are made by quite ordinary conveyances. As Michel Serres has observed (“Loxodromies,” 208–09), Verne’s balloons, sea- and airships, trains
transformation of his characters in parallel with their spatial movements. Thus the general significance of the circuit by which the Vernian adventure is achieved: going forth, arriving—or, more often, nearly arriving—and then coming back. The journey’s formal structure matters more to the literary effects of the novel than do details of the itinerary or the means of travel.
Figure 6. “Lincoln Island” as engraved by Sédille for Hetzel, based on a sketch by Verne. Mysterious Island (1875) I§22.
More to the point, the visual discourse of the Voyages is correspondingly, overwhelmingly, predisposed toward descriptions of one very specific function of the eye with regard to the spaces it encounters: that of the survey or compass. And this is, I think, the motive for his emphasis in the Voyages on travel on or over rather than travel far above or deep below. (This suggests Verne’s unregenerate formalism in play: the marvelous vehicles enter the action so as to support an otherwise abstract relation of vision or discovery; the story is never about the vehicle.) Viewed from a very great distance, landmarks recede into undefined space (Robur§5); for obvious reasons, our vision cannot travel far underground or under the water.39 But seen from a secure vantage on or over, the visible world is extended before or below the supreme point of the gaze. Subjective anxieties of vision are heightened (Axel Lidenbrock reeling from his perch on the steeple of Vor Frelsers Kirk, Journey §3) or they are pacified (Gildas Trégomain calmly admiring the lights of the Algiers harbor, Antifer II§6), but they are in any case pinned, fixed to a
In other words, the phenomenal world can be observed and captured in the rigorous, closed geometry of the atlas: there is, says Paganel, no greater satisfaction than that of the navigator able to draft his discoveries on paper (Grant I§9). Geography abstracts and orders the phenomenal world; cartography is the science of rendering one system for writing spaces into another system for writing the signs of spaces—the dotted line, the cross-hatching, political and geologic borders—providing the geographic imaginary with a cultural and political superstructure. More rational still than geography’s rationalization of the real, cartography cloaks in the language of utility geography’s secret avarice: to master the real through taxonomies of its objects, fungible and constant, which is the coin of the adventurer’s and the tax collector’s realms.
The recurring theme in the Voyages of the perils of the “thirst for gold” is, in this regard, an allegory of the general brittleness of all forms of getting and keeping.41 In Verne, these are always shadowed by expenditure and loss; possession is always precarious. (Even the most classically comedic endings of the novels—the marriages of the final chapters of Around the World in Eighty Days, Last Will of an Eccentric, and The Fabulous Adventures of Captain Antifer—are too easy, too conventional; just the smallest hint of melancholy remains after these formulaic discharges of the novels’ considerable tensions.) So the mastery of space vouchsafed by the atlas may prove under some conditions inconsistent or illusory. Verne’s Three Russians and Three Englishmen set out on their zigzag journey along the twenty-fourth meridian with the aim of deriving the exact length of the meter by triangulation (Three Russians §10). The trip appears on its face the purest scientific endeavor, except for the evidence at every turn not only of its corruption by overweening nationalist pride (political irony of the atlas) but also Verne’s emphasis on the bizarre singlemindedness of the astronomers, whose passion for exactitude leaves them vulnerable to the unquantifiable dangers of the African veldt (ethical irony of the atlas). The laughably distracted Nicholas Palander is the worst of the group, capable of wandering off into a crocodile-infested swamp while calculating logarithms in his head (Three Russians §11); but the novel’s ridiculous climax—the astronomers take their final measurements while exchanging rifle fire with an attacking horde of natives, and must torch their fort so as to send confirmation of their success to their colleagues—suggests that the team is perhaps overcommitted to the pleasures of precision and closure.42 The mission is again imperiled when a baboon steals the logbooks from the miserable M. Palander. A comic chase through the forest canopy ensues; the logbooks are finally retrieved from the unfortunate beast, who is killed and his “excellent flesh” served up for the astronomers’ dinner (Three Russians §22). Tooth and claw: not all the appetites of measurement are kind.
But this cannot really come as a surprise: geo-graphy, carto-graphy—these disciplines of measurement are also practices of writing. The many frailties of the signifier must, inevitably, re-open the passage for the return of things that measurement aims to
Figure 7. Left: “Night approaches”—the Albatross passes over the African veldt. Illustration by Benett. Robur xii (1886). In truth, if some geographer had had at his disposition such a machine, with what facility he could have made a topographic survey of this country, obtain measurements of altitude, determine the courses of rivers and their tributaries, and the positions of cities and villages! There would be no more of these great empty places [ces grandes vides] on the maps of central Africa, no more blanks in pale tints, marked by dotted lines—no more of those vague descriptions that are the despair of the cartographers! (Robur, xii)
“Ah! my friends, a discoverer of new lands is a true inventor! – from this he has such emotions and surprises! But now this store is nearly emptied! Others have seen everything, surveyed everything, invented all the continents or new worlds; we late-comers to geographic science, we have nothing left to do!”
“That’s not true, my dear Paganel,” replied Glenarvan.
“What is left then?”
“What we’re doing now!” (The Children of Captain Grant I§9)
Discovery of the new lands of geographic science is what we are doing now; Glenarvan’s rejoinder to Paganel is a gentle reminder that closure of an imaginary must be represented, and is thus subject to the extensibility of narratives that describe it. In the original French, the sense of his reply is ambiguous: what we are doing[faisons] now is also what we are making [faisons] now. The ongoing work of the voyage is what renovates and recreates the territories it crosses. The world can have no end [la terre n’a pas de bout], Pointe Pescade reminds the kindly but dimwitted Cap Mantifou, because it is round. If it were not round, it wouldn’t turn, and if it didn’t turn, it would remain immobile; and if it remained immobile … “it would fall into the sun in less time that it takes me to make a rabbit disappear!” (Sandorf II§3)—a circus conjurer’s solution to the knottier dilemmas of space and time that cannily circumvents (literally) the need for a prime mover. All that is required to guarantee the motions of the cosmos is a clever story disguised as a chain of necessities.
Which is to say that the dynamism and verisimilitude of the world of the Voyages are products of the narrative devices that advance its turns and corroborate its rules. The purest example of Verne’s spatial idiolect is not a map in the usual sense of that term, but a text that is read like or as a map, demanding of its reader similar attention to the contours, filiations, and boundaries it describes. Verne’s heroes consult maps, they carry them on their voyages, but they very rarely create them, preferring instead to record their adventures in journals, letters, and scientific accounts. (The best example of this general rule is also the most transparent. In those novels that are not first-person memoirs, the narrator drafts no maps and never acknowledges their presence in the paratextual apparatus of the work.) Novelistic conceits of the (iconic) map and the (textual) description are thus crossed, propped up by the text’s literary operations, and spatial and visual imaginaries subjected to the requirements of the textual imperatives of the fiction.
One sign of this unequally-balanced crossing of spatial/visual and textual registers is the number and variety of what might be generally described as procès-verbaux of the Voyages. The novels begin with the discovery or review of a written text: a newly-found fragment, a mysterious letter, a journalist’s puzzled account. The journey—or a significant period of it—concludes with
Less frequently, textual corroborations of spaces in the novels function as an enticement to the reader to conclude that a certain continuity of space is established, when in fact a discontinuity is demanded by the logic of the narrative. Thus we are as surprised as Axel, Lidenbrock, and Hans are to discover that the storm on the Lidenbrock Sea has driven them back to Port Graüben; descriptions of the island on which the Kamylk-Pacha buries his treasure in the opening chapters of Antifer are carefully worded so as to prompt the reader to conclude that Antifer has found the treasure at the end of Book I, when in fact he has located only the first of three sets of instructions. (We should have known this; fifteen chapters remain in the novel, and Verne never needs more than one to wrap up loose ends.) The greater irony in this case is that the opening chapters describe a terrain that has in fact ceased to exist before the main action of the novel begins: Julia Island, the product of an undersea volcano, has already resubmerged and disappeared from the maps Antifer uses in his pursuit of the treasure. The three barrels of bullion and jewels are already unreachable, buried beneath a fourth stone bearing the Kamylk-Pacha’s monogram, three hundred feet beneath the surface (AntiferII§16).48
Describing the Nautilus’s descent to the very bottom of the seas and the limits of Nemo’s technology—“these last reaches of the globe, where life is no longer possible!” (20,000 Leagues II§11)—Aronnax remarks that he has included a photograph taken from the Nautilus’s window (Figure 8). “Here is the proof” [“C’est l’épreuve positive que j’en donne ici”] (20,000 Leagues II§11). De Neuville’s engraving of the descent depicts a sombre, lifeless landscape, perhaps the most still and foreboding of the illustrations of the Voyages. But Verne, as always, plays with multiple valences of his text in this moment: l’épreuve positive, the proof, the positive photographic image, is
Figure 8. “Here is the proof.” 20,000 Leagues II§11 (1870)
But this is not Verne’s most audacious cartographic moment. In chapter 15 of Around the Moon, the Columbiad’s orbit of the moon turns to its dark side, and the crew debate the nature of the mysteries below them, shrouded in darkness. As if on cue—Providence may always be compliant in fiction—a flaming meteor passes the capsule and explodes over the lunar surface, illuminating the world below. The astronauts rush to the window, and for a few seconds, they see—they imagine they see—an impossible landscape: immense spaces, open seas, continents covered with forests. “Was this an illusion?” the narrator asks,
An error of vision? A trick of optics? Could they give a scientific justification for observations obtained so superficially? Could they dare conclude one way or another on the habitability of the moon, after so faint a perception of the invisible disk? (Around §15).As quickly as these questions are posed, the light fades, and an “impenetrable night” returns. But these must have been trick questions, after all. In 1863, what landscape could be more impossible to decide upon than the dark side of the moon? An absolute disjunction between the written record and the perceptions it repeats is thus left standing. The final word is given to a textual account of what may be said at all of that which cannot be seen.
For nearly a century, that is. In 1959, the Soviet Union launched the first successful orbit of the moon by a satellite equipped with photographic capabilities. Naming the landmarks of the undiscovered country is the prerogative of those who survey it first; and the first maps of the moon’s dark side are comprised mostly of tributes to Soviet astronomers, literary, and political figures. But there is one noteworthy exception (Figure 9).
Figure 9. Images from the Lunik III lunar reconnaissance (1959). Left: Map of the moon’s dark side, showing the crater Jules Verne. Right: Photograph of area shown in the map at left. The crater Jules Verne is the dark spot near the right edge of the photograph, about 1/3 up from the lower left-hand corner. (Source: Barabashov, et al. Reproduced with permission.)
I cite here the 1960 mission census: the crater “Jules Verne” is a “dark formation, bounded by a grey background”; its floor is “uniformly dark” and the crater wall is “just visible” (32–33). The crater is located at 151° E, 37° S, just inside the boundary of the Mare Desiderii, the Sea of Dreams.
Barabashov, N.P., A.A. Mikhailov, and Yu. N. Lipsky, eds. An Atlas of the Moon’s Far Side: The Lunik III Reconnaisance. New York: Interscience Publishers, 1961.
Baudelaire, Charles. Les Fleurs du mal. 1857. Paris: Garnier, 1959.
Belloc, Marie A. “Jules Verne at Home.” The Strand Magazine IX (1895): 206–13.
Butcher, William. “De la ligne: Fleuves, logos, et logiques dans les Voyages extraordinaires.” Jules Verne et la modernité. Ed. Jean Bessière. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988. 123–38.
─────. “Le Verbe et la chair, ou l’emploi du temps.” Jules Verne 4 (La Revue des lettres modernes) (1983): 125–48.
Butor, Michel. “Le Point suprême et l’age d’or: À travers quelques œuvres de Jules Verne.” Répertoire. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1960. 130–62.
Chelebourg, Christian. “Cartes et espaces vierges.” Jules Verne 7 (La Revue des lettres modernes) (1994): 149–60.
Compère, Daniel. “Une Figure du récit vernien: La Doublure.” Jules Verne et les sciences humaines (Jules Verne: Colloque de Cerisy). Ed. François Raymond and Simone Vierne. Paris: U.G.E (10/18), 1979. 241–63.
─────. Jules Verne écrivain. Genève: Librairie Droz, 1991.
─────. “Poétique de la carte.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Nouvelle Série) 13.50 (1979): 69–74.
Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness. 1899. Ed. Robert Kimbrough. New York: Norton, 1988.
─────. A Personal Record. 1912. Marlboro, VT: The Marlboro Press, 1982.
Dekiss, Jean-Paul. Jules Verne, l’enchanteur. Paris: Éditions du Félin, 2002.
Dumas, Olivier. “Le Choc de Gallia choque Hetzel.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Nouvelle Série) 19.75 (1985): 220–21.
Evans, Arthur B. “The Illustrators of Jules Verne’s Voyages Extraordinaires.” SFS 25.2 (1998): 241–70.
─────. Jules Verne Rediscovered: Didacticism and the Scientific Novel. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1988.
Gehu, Edmond-P. “La Géographie polaire dans l’œuvre de Jules Verne: Aventures du capitaine Hatteras.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Première série) 2.9 (1937): 181–98.
─────. “La Géographie polaire dans l’œuvre de Jules Verne: Le Pays des fourrures.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Première série) 3.10 (1938): 31–44.
─────. “La Géographie polaire dans l’œuvre de Jules Verne: Le Sphinx des glaces.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Première série) 3.11 (1938): 176–84.
Genette, Gérard. Fiction et diction. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1991.
─────. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. 1987. Trans. Jane E. Lewin. New York: Cambridge UP, 1997.
Kiszely, Magda. “La Bibliothèque de Jules Verne (Suite).” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Nouvelle Série) 30.118 (1995): 44–45.
Koster, Serge. “À propos de Jules Verne: De quelques apparitions de l’auteur.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Nouvelle Série) 11.42 (1977): 43–49.
Martin, Charles-Noël. Jules Verne, sa vie et son œuvre. Lausanne: Éditions Rencontre, 1971.
─────. “Préface à L’École des robinsons.” Les Œuvres de Jules Verne. Vol. 26. Lausanne: Éditions Rencontre, 1966–71. v–xi.
─────. Le Vie et l’œuvre de Jules Verne. Paris: Michel de l’Ormeraie, 1978.
Marcucci, Edmondo. Les Illustrations des Voyages extraordinaires de Jules Verne. Paris: Éditions de la Société Jules Verne, 1956.
Miller, Ron. Extraordinary Voyages: A Reader’s Guide to the Works of Jules Verne. Fredericksburg, VA: Black Cat, 1994.
Nassif, Jacques. “Voyage à la recherche d’un il (d’une île) du je.” Jules Verne 7 (La Revue des lettres modernes) (1994): 51–63.
Petel, Claude. “La Cartographie des Voyages Extraordinaires.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Nouvelle Série) 31.123 (1997): 42–44.
Revue Jules Verne 5 (1998).
Rionnet, Florence, and Piero Gondolo della Riva, eds. Jules Verne à Dinard: Visionnaire et universel. Dinard, France: La Mairie de Dinard, 2000.
Robin, Christian, ed. L’Île mystérieuse dessinée par Jules Verne. Nantes, France: Éditions MeMo, 2000.
Roethel, Michel. “Les Cartonnages Hetzel.” Connaissance des arts 314 (1978): 97–104.
─────. “Les Jules Verne Hetzel.” Connaissance des arts 319 (1978): 109–14.
Rogé, Raymond. “Verne–Conrad: Voyage littéraire dans le continent noir.” Littératures 14 (1986): 87–98.
Serres, Michel. Jouvences sur Jules Verne. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1974.
─────. “Loxodromies des Voyages extraordinaires.” Hermès I: La Communication. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1968. 207–13.
Sherard, R.H. “Jules Verne at Home: His Own Account of His Life and Work.” McClure’s Magazine (January 1894): 115-24.
Stommel, Henry M. Lost Islands: The Story of Islands That Have Vanished from Nautical Charts. Vancouver: U British Columbia P, 1984.
Sudret, Laurence. Nature et artifice dans les Voyages extraordinaires de Jules Verne. Villeneuve d’Asq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 2001.
Terrasse, Pierre. “Le Jeu de cartes de Jules Verne.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Nouvelle Série) 22.87 (1988): 29–33.
Verne, Jules. “Correspondance avec Mario Turiello.” Europe 613 (1980): 108–36.
─────. “Les Méridiens et le calendrier (1873).” Jules Verne 1 (La Revue des lettres modernes) (1976): 125–30.
─────. Les Œuvres de Jules Verne. 50 vols. Lausanne: Éditions Rencontre, 1966–71.
─────. “Souvenirs d’enfance et de jeunesse.” L’Herne 25 (1974): 57–62.
Verne, Jules, and Adolphe d’Ennery. Journey Through the Impossible. Trans. Edward Baxter. Ed. Jean-Michel Margot. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 2003.
Verne, Jules, and Pierre-Jules Hetzel. Correspondance inédite de Jules Verne et de Pierre-Jules Hetzel (1863–1886). Ed. Olivier Dumas, Piero Gondolo della Riva, and Volker Dehs. 3 vols. Geneva: Éditions Slatkine, 1999–2002.
Weissenberg, Éric. “Le Cartonnage du monde solaire.” Bulletin de la Société de Jules Verne (Nouvelle Série). 138 (2001): 34–49.
─────. Jules Verne: Un Univers fabuleux. Lausanne: Favre & Fondation pour l’écrit, 2001.
This essay offers an analysis of the literary and narrative functions of the maps and other related design elements of the illustrated Hetzel editions of Jules Verne’s Voyages Extraordinaires. I argue that the complexity and originality of the play of word and image in these texts represent one of the signal achievements of Verne and his publishers. Taken as a whole, the Voyagesare among the most accomplished and evocative reflections in modern fiction on the relations of the alphabetic text to its graphic counterparts.