Jules Verne Forum
<jvf@Gilead.org.il>
![[Email]](../../../pics/mail.png "Send mail"){kind=small}
![[Members]](../../../pics/monalisa.png "Member list"){kind=small}
![[Photos]](../../../pics/camera.png "Photos"){kind=small}
![[Archive]](../../../pics/reports.png "Browse archive"){kind=small}
![[Search]](../../../pics/search_doc.png "Search archive"){kind=small}
![[FAQ]](../../../pics/question.png "Frequently asked questions"){kind=small}
![[Passwd]](../../../pics/key.png "Get a password"){kind=small}
![[private]](../../../pics/door2_anim.gif "private area"){kind=small}
Re: of tubes and wombs
From: Ron Miller <rmiller~at~crosslink.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 15:59:10 -0500
To: Jules Verne Forum <jvf~at~math.technion.ac.il>
> If I might take a poke at this....
I don't supppose you'd want to rephrase that?
> It seems to me that the earth might not be a womb, but rather a form
> that has "invaginated" the cold hard metal of the gun. As to what the
> shell might be, I am not so sure, but when it is orgasmically "set off"
> it is not ejaculated into the earth, but into space, where it is
> destined to rendezvous with . . . the moon.
>
> Ah ha!
>
> Carter Kaplan
>
Received on Wed 02 Feb 2000 - 22:59:10 IST
JV.Gilead.org.il