Jules Verne Forum

<jvf@Gilead.org.il>

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec 19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009

Re: Michel Lamy and Phileas Fogg

From: wbutcher <wbutcher~at~netvigator.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:16:12 +0800
To: "'Jules Verne Forum'" <jvf~at~gilead.org.il>

Although I would agree that others are possible, I stand by my
interpretation. Try presenting the quotation "Face isn't the only expressive
organ" to people, and see what sort of reaction you get!

The quotation from Gratiolet in many ways supports my argument: Verne often
ascribes "tails" (queues) to humans, with again a suggestive connotation, as
argued by several eminent critics.

Harry also claimed that Fogg was "upstanding"...

Bill
wbutcher~at~netvigator.com
http://home.netvigator.com/~wbutcher/
1/F, 46A, Lung Mei Village, Taipo, Hong Kong


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-jvf~at~Gilead.org.il [mailto:owner-jvf~at~Gilead.org.il] On Behalf Of
volker dehs
Sent: 16 September 2007 15:44
To: Jules Verne Forum
Subject: Michel Lamy and Phileas Fogg

Michel Lamy's book, published for the first time in France in 1984 is simply
utter nonsence with an incoherent argumentation, some interesting views, an
agglomeration of erroneous interpretations, but amusing to read - as all
esoteric dull.

It has nothing, but nothing in common with Bill's well commented
translations of Verne's novels. But I agree with you, Harry, his
interpretation of the quoted passage on Phileas Fogg is not convincing. In
fact, this sentence ('Face isn't the only expressive organ') is a quotation
of the book "De la physionomie et des mouvements d'expressions" of the
physiologist Pierre Gratiolet, an old fried of Hetzel who published his book
posthumously in 1865. Jules Verne quotes Gratiolet in several of his novels
(From Earth to Moon, 20000 Leagues, The Chancellor). There is no necessity
at all for a sexual interpretation, seen the the context of the phrase in
Gratiolet's book:

"La face n'est pas le seul organe expressif des pasions; loin de là, la
main, le pied de l'homme et des animaux, la queue de certains caranassiers,
tels que les chiens et les chats, ont des expressions qu'on ne saurait
méconnaître" (pp. 7-8).

Gratiolet doesn't explain man's character by appearence of man's
physiognomy, but by it's functions.

Cheers,
Volker

>
> I should explain that I was introduced to Jules Verne in the 1980's,
thanks to the BRB International production "Around the World with Willy Fog"
and therefore had an assumption prior to reading the proper book (which I
still thank Bill for sending to me) that Mr. Fogg was a fine, upstanding
English gentlemen which indeed the book proved.
>
>
>
>
> However, I was slightly dismayed to read in the same book William's
insistence that (and I am quoting here):
>
>
> "The clearly legible '- Face isn't the only expressive organ' is also
vital. It's explicit sexual innunedo declares that the mind's composition is
not in the face, that Fogg's imperturability conceals the strongest impulses
and that his fate will ultimately be determined by his libido"
>
>
> I mean look at him for pete's sake. How can anyone with that expression
possibly be more "libido" than Tom Jones??? This is why I think that the
main reason these books are produced are simply to cash in on the money that
started with the Da Vinci Code. I would like to finish my defence of Mr.
Fogg with the following quote from Trial by Jury by Gilbert and Sullivan
>
>
> "The rich attorney my character high tried vainly to disparage!"
>
>
> And if any does seek to disparage Mr. Fogg's character, they'll have me to
answer to!
>
>
> Harry Hayfield (Supporter for Mr. Fogg)

______________________________________________________________________
XXL-Speicher, PC-Virenschutz, Spartarife & mehr: Nur im WEB.DE Club!

Jetzt testen! http://produkte.web.de/club/?mc=021130
Received on Sun 16 Sep 2007 - 10:21:53 IST

JV.Gilead.org.il
Copyright © Zvi Har’El
$Date: 2009/02/01 22:36:11 $$